<Previous>
Advertising and sponsorship are not the only sources of beliefs and
attitudes, but any programme which does not tackle
their alluring promises is bound to fail.
The alcohol industry asks us to believe that these promote
only brand loyalty, and do not affect consumption. If this
were true , why would the industry oppose a collective
ban? Moreover, much brand identification has entered
youth culture, convincing them that more alcohol equals
more fun, sexual success, social acceptance and being
grown-up.(See example in McCreanor’s paper below)
Newer marketing techniques are very sophisticated
e.g. internet / e-mail / texting, are designed to be “beneath the parental radar”. Young people tell
researchers that the advertising, T-shirts’ promotions
and prizes “keep reminding us of our last good boozeup.”
There is no doubt that the code against combining
sexuality with alcohol advising is commonly broken.
Visit <www.tui.co.nz> click on “Tui albums,” then “Miss
Tui 2006,” then “check out the gallery”, a competition
shown on this front page. The Tui TV ads flagrantly
disobey the code.
A cycling NZ coach said, (NZ Herald, 3/5/06), ”Heavy
drinking is endemic to all sporting codes. It’s in a
way an icon of sport.” The liquor industry supports only
measures shown by research to be ineffective, such as
education campaigns. These cannot work while $35M
is spent annually here on advertising which persuades
young people of the opposite, and more is spent on
sponsorship and other promotions. Sponsorship is
heavily associated with sports. Other businesses
should be encouraged to take up sports sponsorship.
The alcohol industry will survive without advertising or
sponsorship.
Serious problems require decisive solutions.
The Government is right that we must address the
basic problem of attitudes to drinking. Returning the
purchase age to 20, limiting advertising to after 10 pm
and an educational campaign don’t go far enough.
This is because young people will always respond
more to the irresponsible promises of social and sexual
success made by alcohol advertising.
No-one wants to interfere with moderate pleasure,
but alcohol harm is tragic for many drinkers. Worse,
it involves all of us, as in road crashes, domestic and
street violence, suicide, home invasion, rape, and filling
up hospital beds. The damage is greater than that
of tobacco, and all people deserve at least as much
protection.