This summer must have been an all-time record for
bad behaviour and serious ill-effects resulting from
drinking to excess.
At New Year police had to put on riot gear to battle
with out-of-control drunk teens at Mt Maunganui and
Nelson. It looked almost like Springbok tour days.
In Auckland the Central Business District is
regarded as unsafe after 10pm by most people
responding to a Friday night survey in the downtown
area. This is due to drunkenness and hoons. A
quarter of people interviewed said they had been
intimidated by drunken people and 58% would support
a by-law prohibiting drinking in public places.
Drinking on the streets has become more of a problem
since the lowering of the drinking age to 18 years.
When in Vancouver, Canada, a few years ago I
witnessed a few people drinking quite moderately
while watching a cricket match, being admonished by
mounted police not to drink in public.
In Lower Hutt Mayor John Terris said that dropping
the drinking age to 18 last year had resulted in an
increase in drunk young people in the Hutt shopping
area. The Hutt City Council is considering funding a
private security guard. Retailers are becoming
disturbed that shoppers are being put off the area
for fear of being confronted with "spitting,
swearing and drunk" young people.
Then there are the personal tragedies and
near-tragedies. On January 21 the "Dominion"
reported that a 10-year-old girl at Gisborne was
found helplessly drunk and needed hospital care. The
next day Wanganui police pulled a drunk 16-year-old
girl and her 12-year-old friend from the Wanganui
River. Two days later the "Herald" reported that
three boys, one of whom was unconscious from
alcohol, had to be taken to North Shore hospital.
The unconscious boy was thought to be 12 years old.
How bad does it have to get before Government will
legislate to protect our youth from themselves and
the liquor industry? When will the fence be put at
the top of the cliff so that the ambulance at the
bottom is not needed?
Professor Sally Casswell speaking at a recent
cannabis seminar said that governments need to think
carefully before liberalising drug laws because it
almost takes a revolution to tighten them again.
This is certainly the case with liquor advertising.
The recent Sale of Liquor Act has given New Zealand
some of the most liberal liquor laws of the
developed world. The effects are sadly obvious.
There is a glimmer of hope because this committee is
to consider options to restrict alcohol advertising
and sponsorship. A paper was provided to the
Committee by the Ministry of Health for their
October meeting last year. The topic will be
considered further at this year's March meeting.
Options for review of alcohol advertising are: a
ministerial committee, a Select Committee, an
appointed committee or an officials' group. These
are alternatives to industry appointed review, of
which there have been two so far.
One of the barriers to legislation restricting
alcohol advertising is the NZ Bill of Rights. This
provides that "Everyone has the right to freedom of
expression, including the freedom to seek, receive,
and impart information and opinions of any kind in
any form". The needs of public health would have to
be shown to be greater than those of free
expression.
Members of the Ministerial Committee are the
Ministers of:
Health
A. King (chair)
Corrections
M. Robson
Customs
P. Bunkle
Justice
P.Goff
Police
G.Hawkins
Maori Affairs
P. Horomia
Youth Affairs
L. Harre
Transport
M. Gosche
Education
T. Mallard
If you would like a copy of the paper contact GALA
at PO Box 285, Waikanae or fax number at the top of
this newsletter.
This fact sheet has been put out by Alcohol
Healthwatch. It is a good recent one page summary of
the facts. Available from them at:
PO Box 99 407
Newmarket
Auckland
or fax 09
520 4152 or ph 09 520 7036.
Some stats from the National Alcohol Strategy.
·
in a recent health survey more than 50% of 15
to 24 year old men reported drinking in a hazardous
manner.
·
a 1998 national survey found that almost a
quarter of women aged 18-19 years who identified
themselves as drinkers reported drinking enough to
feel drunk at least once a week.
·
a recent national survey found that 44% of
male Maori drinkers and 29% of female Maori drinkers
consumed alcohol at hazardous levels.
·
estimates suggest that alcohol contributes to
between 25% and 50% of physical assaults against
spouses. A recent survey found that in the previous
12 months, 10% of men and 5% of women had been
assaulted by someone who had been drinking.
·
a study found that 32% of men and 6% of women
will meet the criteria for alcohol abuse or
dependence over the course of their lifetime.
A billboard featuring Lion's chin-head characters
was the subject of a complaint to the Advertising
Standards Complaints Board by GALA in November. The
upside-down chins with eyes drawn on, look like
cartoon characters. One says "How's a Lion Red
sound?" The other replies "Glug, glug, glug."
The complaint was on the grounds of appeal to
minors. The cartoon-like figures, juvenile language
and humour are clearly directed at children and
teens. The billboard is on State Highway One where
it would be seen by holiday traffic over the
Christmas period. At time of writing it is 11 weeks
since the complaint was made. The complainant has
not heard from the ASCB and the billboard is still
in place doing its mischief. So much for
self-regulation.
Footnote:
Complaint Not Upheld. 12 weeks after lodging the
complaint, the complainant received this verdict.
The explanation is not yet to hand.
The new chair of the ALAC Council is Professor
Andrew Hornblow from Christchurch. We welcome him
especially, as he was a personal supporter of GALA's
newspaper ad calling for a ban on broadcast alcohol
advertising.
The ALAC Act has recently been amended to exclude a
liquor industry representative. Although the liquor
industry squealed about "no taxation without
representation" it is in the end the consumer who
pays the ALAC tax. The Council is to include at
least one Maori, at least one Pacific Islander and
members with relevant experience in public health,
social policy, and treating alcohol dependence.
With this new line up can we expect some leadership
from ALAC
in promoting legislation which will be
effective in reducing harm from alcohol?
Let's hope so.
This excellent paper summarises all points of view
and research. Here are a few snippets:
"About 10% of drinkers drink about half of total
alcohol consumption"
"The industry needs continually to recruit new
generations of young heavy drinkers in order to
maintain profitability."
"Most effective for alcohol is marketing through
sporting activities that attract young males, the
group most likely to be-or learn to be-heavier
drinkers."
Copies of the paper are available from: Alcohol and
Public Health Research Unit, University of Auckland,
Private Bag, Auckland.
In a report presented to MPs and prepared by law
firm Chen and Palmer, the Beer,Wine & Spirits
Council declared themselves in support of the
objectives of the health warnings labelling bill but
lobbied hard against it. Under the heading of "More
Effective Options" they pointed out the BW&S
Council's community initiatives. In an attempt to
appear reasonable and pro-health they have
undertaken a number of these that include:
·
teacher training on how to convey ideas about
healthy drinking to students (in collaboration with
Christchurch College of Education).
·
the establishment of a medical committee to
advise the BW&SC on alcohol and health issues.
·
cards for minors that summarise alcohol laws.
·
financial support for SADD (Students against
Driving Drunk).
·
production and distribution of Alcohol Health
Fact Sheets.
The tobacco industry uses the same tactics.
Although these sound good, beware the spin.
It is typical of the industry to support "soft"
options and oppose those that have real impact on
the public's health.
Freaky ice alcoholic icecream or sorbets from the
Netherlands will soon be available in New Zealand.
These contain about 5% alcohol and are described as
a "sophisticated adult confectionery". They will be
sold at discos and dance bars but also off premise
under the usual age restriction safeguards.
A Frenchman was suing drinks manufacturer Pernod
Ricard because it failed to warn him of the dangers
of becoming addicted to alcohol, his lawyer said.
The 34-year-old man blamed drink for the loss of his
wife and his job.